Merging Forces: Why More U.S. Banks are Converging AML and Fraud
概覽
U.S. banks face real challenges on the road to FRAML, from bringing siloed data together, to integrating real-time and batch processes, to making the business case to begin with. Yet new research reveals that 93% of U.S. mid-market banks are actively pursuing or planning to pursue convergence of their AML and fraud programs — driven by the promise of significant cost savings, improved detection accuracy and stronger regulatory alignment. In fact, 50% of banks that have already converged report savings of over $5 million. While the benefits are clear, the path to convergence is anything but simple. In fact, the term FRAML often oversimplifies what is a complex and layered transformation.
Learning Objectives
Learning how AML/Fraud convergence is delivering cost savings, greater efficiency and improved risk detection and why most U.S. mid-market banks are merging the two
Identifying the most common challenges and blockers to overcome when converging fraud and AML
Exploring how technology can support convergence and what to look for when evaluating vendors
Who Should Attend?
- AFC Professionals
- Anti-Fraud Professionals
- BSA/AML Officers
- Regulators
- Sanctions
Topics
- Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Finance of Terrorism
- Sanctions and Non-proliferation Finance
- Transaction Monitoring
- Technology
- Risk Assessment
- Screening
- Fraud
- Financial Crime Controls
- Risk Management
Industries
- Fintech
- Financial Services
- Professional Services and Technology Solution Providers
- Retail and Entertainment
- Public Sector
- Corporates
- Associations and Non Profit Sectors
- Banks
Regions
- Canada
- Global Or International Organizations
- United States
- North America
- Jurisdictions
Level
- Basic
- Intermediate